Ground improvement
When the ground is too soft, loose or compressible to carry a structure economically, it can often be improved instead of bypassed with deep piles. The choice depends on soil type, depth of the problem layer, the load and the time available. Improvement aims to increase strength, reduce settlement, speed up consolidation or prevent liquefaction.
For soft clays, preloading with an embankment surcharge squeezes out water and pre-consolidates the soil, so that later settlement under the real load is small. Clays drain slowly, so prefabricated vertical drains, band drains pushed in at a close grid, shorten the drainage path from the layer thickness to the drain spacing and cut consolidation time from years to months. Vacuum preloading applies suction instead of fill.
Stone columns, holes formed by vibro-probes and backfilled with compacted gravel, reinforce soft soils, act as drains and stiffen the ground under tanks and embankments; IS 15284 (Part 1) gives guidance. In loose sands, vibro-compaction densifies the ground, and dynamic compaction, repeatedly dropping a heavy weight from a height, densifies deeper layers; its depth of influence grows with the square root of the energy per drop. Grouting, deep soil mixing with cement and jet grouting create stronger columns or blocks.
Every scheme needs trials and verification: settlement plates, piezometers, penetration tests before and after, and load tests, so that the improved ground is shown to meet the design.
Install monitoring before improvement starts so that the baseline is known.
Dynamic compaction depth (Ménard, empirical): D ≈ n √(W H), W in tonnes, H in metres, n ≈ 0.3 to 0.8Stone column area replacement ratio, triangular grid: a_s = 0.907 (d / s)²Consolidation time scales with (drainage path)²
Removing the surcharge before the measured settlement and pore pressures show the target consolidation.
Problem. A 15 t pounder is dropped from 20 m. With n = 0.5, estimate the depth of improvement. Separately, find the area replacement ratio for 0.9 m stone columns at 2.0 m triangular spacing.
- D ≈ 0.5 × √(15 × 20) = 0.5 × √300 = 0.5 × 17.32 = 8.7 m.
- a_s = 0.907 × (0.9 / 2.0)² = 0.907 × 0.2025 = 0.184.
- About 18 percent of the plan area is replaced by stone.
- Both values are first estimates; field trials confirm them.
Answer. Depth of improvement about 8.7 m; area replacement ratio about 0.18
Quick quiz
1How do vertical drains speed up consolidation?
They shorten the drainage path, and time grows with its square.
2Which method suits deep loose sand over a large area?
Dynamic compaction or vibro-compaction.
3Which Indian standard gives stone column guidance?
IS 15284 (Part 1).
- IS 15284 (Part 1) (India): Design and construction for ground improvement: guidelines, stone columns.
- EN 1997 (Eurocode 7) (Europe): Geotechnical design.
Cited by number and clause only. We do not reproduce clause text, tables or figures (BIS Act 2016, s.10(5) and s.11). Check the current edition and amendments before use.
References and further reading
Standard texts, listed in no order of merit. We do not copy text, figures, tables or solved problems from any book; our explanations and examples are original.
- B. M. Das, Principles of Foundation Engineering, Cengage, latest edition.
- J. E. Bowles, Foundation Analysis and Design, McGraw Hill, 5th edition.
- M. J. Tomlinson, J. Woodward, Pile Design and Construction Practice, CRC Press, latest edition.
Free and official sources
Found an error? Write to indiacongroupofengineers [at] gmail [dot] com. For corrections and feedback. We never ask for payment or personal details.