Canal lining
Unlined canals in permeable soils can lose a large share of their flow by seepage before water reaches the fields. Seepage also raises the water table nearby, leading to waterlogging and salinity, and weakens banks. Lining the canal with an impermeable layer reduces these losses, allows higher velocities and thus smaller sections, controls weeds and reduces maintenance. The saved water can irrigate more land.
Common linings include cement concrete cast in place or as precast slabs, burnt clay tiles or bricks laid in mortar, stone masonry, shotcrete, soil-cement, and flexible membranes of low-density polyethylene or geomembrane protected by a cover of concrete or soil. Choice depends on cost, available materials, canal size, ground conditions and expected life. Concrete is durable and hydraulically smooth, with a Manning n around 0.015 to 0.018; membranes are very watertight but need protection from damage.
Linings fail mostly from what happens behind them. Rapid drawdown leaves water pressure behind the lining with nothing in front, causing uplift and cracking; pressure relief valves and under-drains are provided where the water table is high. Expansive soils heave and crack rigid linings, so a cushion of non-expansive soil is placed under them. Joints must be sealed to stay watertight. Seepage losses are estimated by ponding or inflow-outflow tests before and after lining to measure the benefit.
Manning formula: Q = (1/n) A R^(2/3) S^(1/2), with n about 0.015 to 0.018 for good concrete linings, so a lined section can carry the same discharge at a smaller cross-section than an unlined earthen one.
Measure seepage by ponding before deciding to line; it shows where lining pays back first.
Saving = (loss unlined − loss lined) × lengthPonding test: loss rate = (fall in level × water surface area) / (wetted area × time)
Problem. A 12 km canal reach loses 2.2 m³/s per million m² of wetted area when unlined and 0.25 m³/s per million m² when lined. Wetted perimeter is 14 m. Find the seepage saving.
- Wetted area = 12 000 × 14 = 168 000 m² = 0.168 million m².
- Unlined loss = 2.2 × 0.168 = 0.370 m³/s.
- Lined loss = 0.25 × 0.168 = 0.042 m³/s.
- Saving ≈ 0.33 m³/s, enough to irrigate several hundred more hectares at typical duties.
Answer. About 0.33 m³/s saved
Quick quiz
1Name two benefits of canal lining.
Reduced seepage and higher velocity (also less waterlogging, weed control).
2What causes lining uplift failure?
Water pressure behind the lining during rapid drawdown.
3Why use a cushion layer in expansive soil?
To stop soil heave from cracking a rigid lining.
- IS 7784 (series) (India): Design of cross-drainage works such as aqueducts and syphons.
Clauses and documents to read
- IS 3873:1993 (laying cement concrete and stone slab lining on canals)
- IS 10430:2000 (criteria for design of lined canals)
- IS 9451:1994 (lining of canals in expansive soils)
Cited by number and clause only. We do not reproduce clause text, tables or figures (BIS Act 2016, s.10(5) and s.11). Check the current edition and amendments before use.
References and further reading
Standard texts, listed in no order of merit. We do not copy text, figures, tables or solved problems from any book; our explanations and examples are original.
- S. K. Garg, Irrigation Engineering and Hydraulic Structures, Khanna Publishers, latest edition.
- G. L. Asawa, Irrigation and Water Resources Engineering, New Age International, latest edition.
Free and official sources
Found an error? Write to indiacongroupofengineers [at] gmail [dot] com. For corrections and feedback. We never ask for payment or personal details.