Ductile detailing for earthquakes
Buildings are designed for earthquake forces well below the elastic demand, on the understanding that the structure will yield and dissipate energy without collapsing. That understanding holds only if the yielding is ductile and happens in the right places. Ductile detailing is the set of rules that makes it so, and in India it is given in IS 13920 for reinforced concrete.
The first principle is strong column, weak beam. Plastic hinges should form at beam ends, where many can form without endangering the building, and not in columns, where hinges in one storey create a sway mechanism that can collapse it. IS 13920:2016 requires the sum of column moment capacities at a joint to exceed the sum of beam capacities by a margin of 1.4. A related principle is that shear failure, which is brittle, must never precede flexural yielding, so shear is designed for the force that develops when the hinges reach their probable moment capacity.
Confinement is the second principle. Closely spaced closed hoops at column ends and in beam hinge zones hold the core concrete together after the cover spalls, prevent the main bars from buckling and keep shear capacity. The hoops must end in 135-degree hooks with an extension of six bar diameters, but not less than 65 mm, so they stay anchored in the core when the cover is lost. Laps are kept out of hinge zones and enclosed by hoops.
Beam-column joints, where beam bars pass through or anchor into columns, carry very high shear in an earthquake and need hoops through the joint. Shear walls need boundary elements at their edges when compressive stress is high. Each rule addresses a failure mode seen repeatedly in past earthquakes.
Adding top steel to a beam "for safety" can break the strong-column rule; re-check the joint whenever beam steel increases.
Strong column, weak beam (IS 13920:2016): Σ M_c ≥ 1.4 Σ M_b at each jointCapacity-design shear in beams: V = gravity shear + (M_b,left + M_b,right) / L_clear, using probable (overstrength) momentsHoop hooks: 135°, extension 6 d_b but not less than 65 mm
Placing lap splices of column bars at the floor level, inside the hinge zone.
Problem. At an interior joint, the beams framing in have design moment capacities of 180 kNm and 120 kNm (acting in the same sense under sway). The columns above and below have capacities of 200 kNm and 220 kNm. Check the strong-column rule.
- Σ M_b = 180 + 120 = 300 kNm.
- Required Σ M_c ≥ 1.4 × 300 = 420 kNm.
- Provided Σ M_c = 200 + 220 = 420 kNm.
- 420 ≥ 420, so the rule is just satisfied; any increase in beam steel would need stronger columns.
Answer. Just satisfies Σ Mc ≥ 1.4 Σ Mb (420 kNm against 420 kNm required)
Quick quiz
1Why should hinges form in beams rather than columns?
Column hinges in one storey can form a collapse mechanism.
2Why 135° hooks on hoops?
They stay anchored in the core after the cover spalls.
3Why design shear for the probable flexural capacity?
So brittle shear failure cannot occur before ductile flexural yielding.
- IS 13920 (India): Ductile design and detailing of reinforced concrete structures for seismic forces.
- IS 1893 (Part 1) (India): Criteria for earthquake-resistant design: seismic zones and how to work out earthquake forces.
- IS 456 (India): Plain and reinforced concrete: general rules for materials, durability, design and construction.
- ACI 318 (USA): Building code requirements for structural concrete.
- EN 1998 (Eurocode 8) (Europe): Design of structures for earthquake resistance.
Clauses and documents to read
- IS 13920:2016: beams, columns, beam-column joints and special shear walls (strong-column factor 1.4; hoop hook geometry)
Cited by number and clause only. We do not reproduce clause text, tables or figures (BIS Act 2016, s.10(5) and s.11). Check the current edition and amendments before use.
References and further reading
Standard texts, listed in no order of merit. We do not copy text, figures, tables or solved problems from any book; our explanations and examples are original.
- S. Unnikrishna Pillai, Devdas Menon, Reinforced Concrete Design, McGraw Hill Education (India), latest edition.
- J. K. Wight, J. G. MacGregor, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, Pearson, latest edition.
- A. H. Nilson, D. Darwin, C. W. Dolan, Design of Concrete Structures, McGraw Hill, latest edition.
- R. Park, T. Paulay, Reinforced Concrete Structures, Wiley, 1975.
Free and official sources
Found an error? Write to indiacongroupofengineers [at] gmail [dot] com. For corrections and feedback. We never ask for payment or personal details.